From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10812171651g78b9058au22f49b1462d51bb1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:39 -0800
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <64A52D55-60D5-4945-B33E-FA304906A3E2@sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <9ab217670812171610k2dcc5650ve5f69da704afe55c@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10812171632k2aa26e9ak1c25f30267785330@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10812171633u21cba397t3e6b9ab78376cac1@mail.gmail.com>
	<64A52D55-60D5-4945-B33E-FA304906A3E2@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx Patches
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6596f9dc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:

> In fact, Ron, now that you've mentioned it -- I'm going to try the PerfAn
> on 9vx myself ;-) And here's the question for you: how representative
> the behavior of 9vx is supposed to be of the regular Plan9 kernel?

I don't know but the code sure looked like a plan 9 kernel to me.

ron