From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <13426df10812180825p7002c20eoc1f2730882535ec0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:25:53 -0800 From: "ron minnich" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30812180008qad9b75madd55fad684d7730@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <13426df10812171407r7a0d86ecid15a889d11f6f1da@mail.gmail.com> <6487e3461bf190c64ebc357e9bb6998b@proxima.alt.za> <140e7ec30812180008qad9b75madd55fad684d7730@mail.gmail.com> Cc: lucio@proxima.alt.za Subject: Re: [9fans] devtrace release time Topicbox-Message-UUID: 67a8cb4c-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:08 AM, sqweek wrote: > Yes, uriel's manner is abrasive, and it gets old listening to him > make the same complaints over and over. >when uriel perceives an inhibitor to plan 9's growth and development, >uriel raises his voice (because no one else will!). The interesting paradox being that Uriel has so annoyed some critical people that they no longer post to this list. Hence Uriel should raise his voice about uriel, as uriel is an inhibitor. But wait, his voice *is* the inhibitor. Should he then not raise his voice? Should he raise his voice against himself? What would the barber of Seville have to say about this? He only shaves those who don't shave themselves! ron