From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10812181926w7ef1d03bj2ad1befce75b3dc8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:26:56 -0800
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <8FC3CE71-0E96-4A7E-82E3-0A32722F0EFD@sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <59EE20C6-0043-4517-ADDA-4BC5C4D24D74@sun.com>
	<dd6fe68a0812181557u28bf4c9drc1bdb417d6e4d1ed@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10812181603l56910094m7165f27179047a3a@mail.gmail.com>
	<8FC3CE71-0E96-4A7E-82E3-0A32722F0EFD@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9pfuse and O_APPEND
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6a22a668-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:

> Its fun, yes. But I believe this is more of a testament to the statelessness
> of the NFS
> plus the fact that the "end of file" is not a well defined offset (unlike
> beginning of
> the file).
>

no, it's even worse with stateful systems.

The mistake is doing append mode at the client, not the server.

ron