From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sources Gone?
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:15:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df10901290815u470ef46sba37c7f6652062e4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920901290412k3e48d87dy5261c9b1f1681127@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> All this has been solved by git and hg; and git and hg would *never*
> wipe out your local files simply because the backing store for the
> repository you are pulling from happens to break,
Have you used git much? Sure, it's nice. Have you tried it when it
hits 6 gbyte size as we have here, and repo is filled with binaries,
not just source?
It gets rather slow. At least for us. Also, as has been pointed out,
it is not unsurprisingly optimized to Linux. MacOS users complain to
me that it doesn't do well on MacOS.
Finally, the tools!
git git-get-tar-commit-id git-read-tree
git-add git-grep git-rebase
git-add--interactive git-gui git-rebase--interactive
git-am git-hash-object git-receive-pack
git-annotate git-http-fetch git-reflog
git-apply git-http-push git-relink
git-archimport git-imap-send git-remote
git-archive git-index-pack git-repack
git-bisect git-init git-repo-config
git-blame git-init-db git-request-pull
git-branch git-instaweb git-rerere
git-bundle gitk git-reset
git-cat-file git-log git-revert
git-check-attr git-lost-found git-rev-list
git-checkout git-ls-files git-rev-parse
git-checkout-index git-ls-remote git-rev-tree
git-check-ref-format git-ls-tree git-rm
git-cherry git-mailinfo git-send-email
git-cherry-pick git-mailsplit git-send-pack
git-citool git-merge git-shell
git-clean git-merge-base git-shortlog
git-clone git-merge-file git-show
git-commit git-merge-index git-show-branch
And it all seemed so simple in the early days.
Why not just understand and fix replica, instead of throwing stones?
What's the point? To replace actual coding with verbiage?
The part that confuses me most is that, IIRC, you were extolling the
virtues of venti a few days ago (with which I agree), particularly
that it is "rock solid" (true). But the current problem was a venti
outage. Conclusion: stuff happens. When stuff happens, bugs are
exposed. Bugs can be fixed. Erik's already proposed one fix, let's get
more.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 11:56 Gregory Pavelcak
2009-01-23 14:15 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-23 14:54 ` lucio
2009-01-23 15:09 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:59 ` Uriel
2009-01-27 23:32 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-28 0:58 ` Kenji Arisawa
2009-01-28 5:06 ` Uriel
2009-01-28 11:46 ` Iruata Souza
2009-01-28 12:41 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-01-28 13:53 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 12:12 ` Uriel
2009-01-29 13:37 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 16:45 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:15 ` ron minnich [this message]
2009-01-29 16:34 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:30 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 17:18 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-29 17:30 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 17:43 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-29 17:39 ` gas
2009-01-29 21:09 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 21:42 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 23:05 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 23:49 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-30 0:28 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-30 4:46 ` [9fans] Venti and version control (Was: Sources Gone?) lucio
2009-01-30 5:18 ` [9fans] Sources Gone? lucio
2009-01-31 13:45 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-01-31 18:12 ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-31 18:44 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-02 22:33 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-02 22:43 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-02 23:26 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-02 23:39 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 10:04 ` Richard Miller
2009-02-03 4:23 ` lucio
2009-02-03 5:23 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 5:47 ` lucio
2009-02-03 12:54 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 13:38 ` roger peppe
2009-02-03 14:01 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 16:13 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-02-03 16:22 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 16:51 ` roger peppe
2009-02-03 16:55 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-03 17:30 ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-02-05 1:24 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-03 17:42 ` lucio
2009-02-03 17:40 ` lucio
2009-02-03 17:51 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-04 8:40 ` sqweek
2009-02-04 16:40 ` [9fans] Some arithmetic [was: Re: Sources Gone?] Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-04 17:10 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-04 17:49 ` hiro
2009-02-05 11:19 ` Dave Eckhardt
2009-02-05 17:38 ` Russ Cox
2009-02-05 17:41 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-05 18:08 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-05 18:22 ` Micah Stetson
2009-02-05 18:29 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-05 18:31 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-05 18:32 ` hiro
2009-01-30 4:25 ` [9fans] Sources Gone? lucio
2009-01-29 22:33 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-29 22:58 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 23:06 ` Russ Cox
2009-01-29 12:13 ` kokamoto
2009-01-27 23:11 ` Patrick Kristiansen
2009-01-28 0:11 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2009-01-28 5:55 ` lucio
2009-01-29 18:00 erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 18:00 erik quanstrom
[not found] <2b0250f2fe16a645a4641825c2f33741@quanstro.net>
2009-02-03 17:27 ` lucio
2009-02-05 1:20 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13426df10901290815u470ef46sba37c7f6652062e4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).