From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <138575260902180701yf70a90y9a55b9607d785cb8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <138575260902180701yf70a90y9a55b9607d785cb8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:17:48 -0800
Message-ID: <13426df10902180717v3341c8acgf4f61724aa2ba2c0@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Another acme question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a37ea524-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM, hugo rivera <uair00@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not really sure how can this be done, if at all.
> Lets imagine I have a program in my path, that I want to execute from
> acme, called New (yes, the same name as the acme's New command). How
> do I execute it by middle clicking on it without acme thinking I am
> refering to its own command and, therefore, creating a new window that
> I never wanted?

cave man approach:
cat > bin/rc/New
#!/bin/rc
date
=04term% chmod +x bin/rc/New

in the Acme line
rc -c New

works fine for me.

The easier thing to do : don't create a command named New.

"doctor, it hurts when I do *this*"
"then don't do it"


ron