From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c4a46c570903031230v675118fcm29b3580e1d6cc06d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a560a5d00903030407h4119527dj479d890123491103@mail.gmail.com>
	<dd6fe68a0903030809x7c3bc390n43577e4808e980c7@mail.gmail.com>
	<c4a46c570903031230v675118fcm29b3580e1d6cc06d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2009 14:13:29 -0800
Message-ID: <13426df10903031413n13e53b8bxef266c2551aa8abd@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] command repetition in sam/acme
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ad22a364-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

This discussion strikes me as coming from a different galaxy. It seems
to me that Acme and Sam clearly don't match the task at hand. We're
trying to use a screwdriver when we need a jackhammer .

I don't see the point in complaining about file formats. The
scientists in this case don't much care what we think. They're not
going to rewrite their formats so someone can use Acme.

Here's my suggestion:

vi

ron