From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dd6fe68a0903201011p3bfc16b8n60a182fc0a0b26f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13426df10903200723h48d692e3lb1266a112c61d8f7@mail.gmail.com>
	<701581b43c25c1d9450823536223f6ce@quanstro.net>
	<dd6fe68a0903201011p3bfc16b8n60a182fc0a0b26f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:16:47 -0700
Message-ID: <13426df10903201616o3f2e7149i4b589fc1f4f2790a@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] I can not remember if I sent this or not: MIPS-64 (sort
	of) notebook
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c195ef18-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Is a mips-64 port a reasonable GSOC project? The person doing it could
not come in cold, but there is a starting point it seems.

In spite of my earlier suggestion, I have to agree with Russ. Gcc and
its utils are a daily headache for me, I'd rather just get a mips-64
compiler port first.

ron