From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3aaafc130904171906v360fa304qea85ac5962d440f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <13426df10904171515g571f7781x38ca528cfbce1149@mail.gmail.com> <3aaafc130904171535j4ecac3b4t64251cb52ba81b71@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10904171601s413675a3nd88d89dbd7fa4bb2@mail.gmail.com> <3aaafc130904171906v360fa304qea85ac5962d440f0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:39:27 -0700 Message-ID: <13426df10904171939l5e9fd9ccu645c1f125e1973f6@mail.gmail.com> From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years Topicbox-Message-UUID: e4d36690-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:06 PM, J.R. Mauro wrote: > Yeah, the problem's bigger than I thought (not surprising since I > didn't think much about it). I'm having a hard time figuring out how > Condor handles these issues. All I can see from the documentation is > that it gives you warnings. the original condor just forwarded system calls back to the node it was started from. Thus all system calls were done in the context of the originating node and user. > But this still has the 90% problem you mentioned. it's just plain harder than it looks ... ron