9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] "FAWN: Fast array of wimpy nodes" (was: Plan 9 - the next 20 years)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:48:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df10904200848w1a6fcc97iaa091cfa9798870c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f34febc0904190058u1507f60fldc51ab3eab1f09fe@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:58 AM, John Barham <jbarham@gmail.com> wrote:
> I certainly can't think ahead 20 years but I think it's safe to say
> that the next 5 (at least doing HPC and large-scale web type stuff)
> will increasingly look like this:
> http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22504/?a=f, which talks
> about building a cluster from AMD Geode (!) nodes w/ compact flash
> storage.  Sure it's not super-fast, but it's very efficient per watt.
> If you had more cash you might substitute HE Opterons and SSD's but
> the principle is the same.

It's nice. We did that one a few years ago. Here is the 7 year old
version: http://eri.ca.sandia.gov/eri/howto.html

We've been doing these with the Geode stuff since about 2006. We are
certainly not the first. The RLX was doing what FAWN did about 8 years
ago; orion, about 3-4 years ago (both transmeta). RLX and Orion
multisystems showed there is not much of a market for lots of wimpy
nodes -- yet or never, is the real question. Either way, they did not
have enough buyers to stay in business. And RLX had to drop its wimpy
transmetas for P4s, and they could not keep up with the cheap
mainboards. It's a tough business.

ron



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-20 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-19  7:58 John Barham
2009-04-19 12:16 ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-19 15:43   ` John Barham
2009-04-19 16:52     ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-20 15:11       ` John Barham
2009-04-20 16:48         ` erik quanstrom
2009-04-19 14:27 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-04-19 20:11   ` tlaronde
2009-04-20 15:48 ` ron minnich [this message]
2009-04-20 17:15   ` Wes Kussmaul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13426df10904200848w1a6fcc97iaa091cfa9798870c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rminnich@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).