From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3aaafc130907131518y74523ef8rf9ddb92fb3d3d105@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.64.0907110843190.5249@malasada.lava.net>
	<0F3972F5-D44B-4231-97FA-C6CE871B032B@gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.0907110901260.5249@malasada.lava.net>
	<140e7ec30907130124g1a0e4c90m6d83a08516d95463@mail.gmail.com>
	<a4e6962a0907130720k4ea87ba6mb6ac6bb2180633ee@mail.gmail.com>
	<f4d8fa40907131344p44ea34d5kfd2e99537d96ab65@mail.gmail.com>
	<f4d8fa40907131445p41f686b7ocab185a9e986f13a@mail.gmail.com>
	<a4e6962a0907131505g63dbe3edl72261c03a1601ddd@mail.gmail.com>
	<3aaafc130907131518y74523ef8rf9ddb92fb3d3d105@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:16:04 -0700
Message-ID: <13426df10907131616k203f0676yb181157cac24d179@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] v9fs question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1deb7e36-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:18 PM, J.R. Mauro<jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote:

> We hope to. One of the reasons it would actually be unwise to let
> anyone mount anything now is that no one uses per-process namespaces.
> That's probably fine on your desktop, but not on a server where 20
> people try to mount something under /mnt/foo or whatnot.

Could we solve this by making private mounts the default (or only
allowed) behavior?

That's how I did it long ago: it took real effort to make a mount non-private.

ron