From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1257590719.28012.1344036163@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <55c52a87f0b8c0ac12a81a150f110b2b@brasstown.quanstro.net> <20091101184418.GM19125@gradx.cs.jhu.edu> <1257590719.28012.1344036163@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:44:38 -0800 Message-ID: <13426df10911070944g2d4e8700o97f1455f5800826e@mail.gmail.com> From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] dtrace for plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 97f8cd82-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > I don't know anything specific about DTrace, but I'm thinking a clear, > consistent interface for logging and tracing kernel operations sounds > like a good thing. I have seen several use cases for DTrace and one thing that I would find useful are even more examples. Of course, plan 9 file servers are in user space, and the fact that DTrace can integrate kernel and user mode tracing is very handy. ron