From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <80c99e791001240502v3e7c955ek130ded319bb03ef5@mail.gmail.com> <3e1162e61001241209j1593ad03m3183aae443427c92@mail.gmail.com> <26DD1048-064D-43D3-8C62-60450FD411A8@fastmail.fm> <80c99e791001270523i4b63f1easffb015894ec38cd4@mail.gmail.com> <967f8c7c0977f7a2ef9611430135b9b3@brasstown.quans> <4e5118b000fadeed93db312154ee4575@ladd.quanstro.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:49:04 -0800 Message-ID: <13426df11001271349o7dee5c60l2cad4a93ebc50b76@mail.gmail.com> From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] mount acme on plan9port Topicbox-Message-UUID: c8cf06ba-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > reflection of Linux VFS operations into 9P is often a strange and > interesting experience. Wish I could find Lucho's email on this, but the Linux guys particularly don't like things like clone files; "Our scripts will read them and cause trouble" is the basic complaint. Bringing some of these new ideas to older OSes will hit some incompatibilities that can't be fixed ... ron