From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <twig.1268509111.65424@swcp.com>
References: <138575261003120253t4eb3a9b6k4d5902288c8c8f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<a81fe9be1003120744t4342a6bkcebe9acf0626b830@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df11003120853p3b0e17c1h8f757cdf15ef7385@mail.gmail.com>
	<twig.1268509111.65424@swcp.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:00:19 -0800
Message-ID: <13426df11003131300y20cda1e9ve3dd0b88238ba05b@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: ebo@sandien.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7f8265c-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM, EBo <ebo@sandien.com> wrote:

> So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest? =A0Or have I misinterpret=
ed what
> you ment by stuck ;-)

Just going by performance and portability, 9vx is a way better way to
go than lguest.

ron