From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13426df11003161119s285173f0tc4d5004554e1185d@mail.gmail.com> References: <13426df11003161029v7fb35a3ft51d0e64af29aca72@mail.gmail.com> <13426df11003161119s285173f0tc4d5004554e1185d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:04:36 -0800 Message-ID: <13426df11003161604t20c78a8btb4dc38bde0245c4e@mail.gmail.com> From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting qemu problem Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea8067cc-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I was wrong. I built a new kernel from sources and performance is still very bad, with a load of 2500 minimum. Also, venti, on this little machine, is a bit hungry for memory. venti...2010/0316 20:31:06 venti: conf.../boot/venti: mem 1,048,576 bcmem 140,753,578 icmem 211,130,368...httpd tcp!127.1!8000...init...icache 211,130,368 bytes = 3,298,912 entries; 16 scache sync...2010/0316 20:31:12 arenas01: indexing 430 clumps... announce tcp!127.1!17034...serving. fossil(#S/sdC0/fossil)...fsys: dialing venti at tcp!127.1!17034 This image formerly ran in 256M, now requires 512M, because venti footprint is 140+211+211 ... wait, how does it ever fit in 512 anyway. I think qemu changed too. An old kernel has the same problems. Not sure what is up here. but for now qemu on unongo 9.10 is useless for plan 9 from what I can see. ron