From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <26e5c9caa2b6ed707820426e080f733c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <13426df11003161029v7fb35a3ft51d0e64af29aca72@mail.gmail.com>
	<b66f89840148a69e10defc9987a4a2c1@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<13426df11003161119s285173f0tc4d5004554e1185d@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df11003161604t20c78a8btb4dc38bde0245c4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<26e5c9caa2b6ed707820426e080f733c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:16:21 -0800
Message-ID: <13426df11003161616j6ff9c706s92fc92e75cb82dd3@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting qemu problem
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea8bab00-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wro=
te:
>> This image formerly ran in 256M, now requires 512M, because venti
>> footprint is 140+211+211 ... wait, how does it ever fit in 512 anyway.
>
> swap? =A0this would answer two questions.

I should mention that another person here tried qemu recently and
commented that it was dog slow as well.

Something changed in qemu I think and it's affecting plan 9. That was
a very old qemu image and it was peppy in the old days.

ron