9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] recreational programming of an evening
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:07:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df11003220907o3d2d4959s5824d5e356fe438e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e61003220847k2129d16ara4474e75e2c2a755@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:47 AM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:

> I got the hunch it wasn't designed at all, but more "hacked on" or evolved.

I shouldn't be so down on Linux, as it is arguably the most successful
OS out there. It runs on my e-reader, will be running on my next
phone, probably runs on things you own which you don't know about --
it's everywhere. It made a lot of what I do in HPC possible.

Linux's runaway success is part of the problem! It is almost
inevitable that when you run on *anything* and you open the gates to
lots of contributors your work will lose a certain intellectual
coherence, and that's what has happened with Linux. Add to the fact
that he started with a pretty old-fashioned design (classical Unix,
with it's "major and minor nodes" and so on) and it's not surprising
that it's not that pretty.

And there are parts of it that are quite elegant, such as lguest.

But it still gives me a splitting headache every time I have to
deep-dive to do anything :-)

ron



  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-21  5:48 ron minnich
2010-03-21  8:30 ` EBo
2010-03-21 17:36 ` Stuart Morrow
2010-03-21 17:39   ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-21 21:47   ` ron minnich
2010-03-21 22:02     ` EBo
2010-03-21 22:56       ` hiro
2010-03-22  0:02         ` EBo
2010-03-22 15:50           ` David Leimbach
2010-03-22 15:57             ` andrey mirtchovski
2010-03-22 16:09               ` David Leimbach
2010-03-22 17:22                 ` Chad Brown
2010-03-22 17:54                   ` Chad Brown
2010-03-22 16:09               ` erik quanstrom
2010-03-21 23:19       ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2010-03-21 23:54         ` EBo
2010-03-22  5:57         ` Skip Tavakkolian
2010-03-22 15:47     ` David Leimbach
2010-03-22 16:07       ` ron minnich [this message]
2010-03-21 17:57 ` Bakul Shah
2010-03-21 18:03   ` Devon H. O'Dell
2010-03-21 18:59     ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2010-03-21 22:08       ` EBo
2010-03-21 19:37     ` Steve Simon
2010-03-21 20:41     ` Bakul Shah
2010-03-21 21:48   ` ron minnich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-17  4:37 ron minnich
2010-03-17  9:15 ` Noah Evans
2010-03-17 15:12   ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13426df11003220907o3d2d4959s5824d5e356fe438e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rminnich@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).