From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) From: Jeff Sickel In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:34:38 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1380F3F7-579E-4E7D-8245-8E916562E9D6@corpus-callosum.com> References: <1AB751B9-F2EB-499C-B172-387A4C3C40E7@corpus-callosum.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] VirtualBox, Mavericks, and Plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: eda2bfd8-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On May 22, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu = wrote: > I have both 1.6.1 and 2.0 on 10.9 (the latest). 1.6.1 is not ancient > and I didn't even need to compile it. Plan 9 runs just fine. 2.0 I > compiled because I needed the new arm64 support. It wasn't hard. What=E2=80=99s your Mac OS X build environment? Are you using some = ports tree to get all the dependencies required by qemu? A stock OS X 10.9.3 with Xcode (with clang et al) won=E2=80=99t build qemu because, well, = =E2=80=A6 it doesn=E2=80=99t build. -jas