9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hugo rivera <uair00@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] threads vs forks
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2009 16:33:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <138575260903030733y22df5705qd54d7d117d5628fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60903030719v141b41e9ma5fd98c73d8b0e7c@mail.gmail.com>

thanks a lot guys.
I think I should study this issue in greater detail. It is not as easy
as I tought it would be.

2009/3/3, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:52 AM, hugo rivera <uair00@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this is not really a plan 9 question, but since you are the wisest
> > guys I know I am hoping that you can help me.
> > You see, I have to launch many tasks running in parallel (~5000) in a
> > cluster running linux. Each of the task performs some astronomical
> > calculations and I am not pretty sure if using fork is the best answer
> > here.
> > First of all, all the programming is done in python and c, and since
> > we are using os.fork() python facility I think that it is somehow
> > related to the underlying c fork (well, I really do not know much of
> > forks in linux, the few things I do know about forks and threads I got
> > them from Francisco Ballesteros' "Introduction to operating system
> > abstractions").
>
> My knowledge on this subject is about 8 or 9 years old, so
> check with your local Python guru....
>
> The last I'd heard about Python's threading is that it was cooperative only,
> and that you couldn't get real parallelism out of it.  It serves as a means
> to organize your program in a concurrent manner.
>
> In other words no two threads run at the same time in Python, even if you're
> on a multi-core system, due to something they call a "Global Interpreter
> Lock".
>
> >
> > The point here is if I should use forks or threads to deal with the job at
> hand?
> > I heard that there are some problems if you fork too many processes (I
> > am not sure how many are too many) so I am thinking to use threads.
> > I know some basic differences between threads and forks, but I am not
> > aware of the details of the implementation (probably I will never be).
> > Finally, if this is a question that does not belong to the plan 9
> > mailing list, please let me know and I'll shut up.
> > Saludos
> >
>
> I think you need to understand the system limits, which is something you can
> look up for yourself.  Also you should understand what kind of runtime model
> threads in the language you're using actually implements.
>
> Those rules basically apply to any system.
>
> >
> > --
> > Hugo
> >
> >
>
>


--
Hugo



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-03 11:52 hugo rivera
2009-03-03 15:19 ` David Leimbach
2009-03-03 15:32   ` Uriel
2009-03-03 16:15     ` hugo rivera
2009-03-03 15:33   ` hugo rivera [this message]
2009-03-03 18:11   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-03-03 18:38     ` Bakul Shah
2009-03-06 18:47       ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-03-06 20:38         ` David Leimbach
2009-03-07  8:00           ` Bakul Shah
2009-03-07  0:21         ` Bakul Shah
2009-03-07  2:20           ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-03-03 23:08     ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-03 23:15       ` Uriel
2009-03-03 23:23         ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-03 23:54           ` Devon H. O'Dell
2009-03-04  0:33             ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-04  0:54               ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-04  1:54                 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-04  3:18                   ` James Tomaschke
2009-03-04  3:30                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-04  4:44                       ` James Tomaschke
2009-03-04  5:05                         ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-04  5:50                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-04  6:08                             ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-03-04 16:52                             ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-04 17:14                               ` ron minnich
2009-03-04 17:27                                 ` William Josephson
2009-03-04 18:15                                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-05  3:32                                 ` J.R. Mauro
2009-03-05  3:39                                   ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-05  3:55                                   ` William K. Josephson
2009-03-05  4:00                                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-05  4:16                                       ` William K. Josephson
2009-03-07  3:01                                         ` William Josephson
2009-03-07  3:31                                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07  6:00                                             ` William Josephson
2009-03-07 13:58                                               ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07 14:37                                                 ` William Josephson
2009-03-07 15:05                                                   ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07 15:28                                                     ` William K. Josephson
2009-03-07  5:00                                           ` lucio
2009-03-07  5:08                                             ` William Josephson
2009-03-07  5:19                                               ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07  5:45                                                 ` [9fans] Flash William K. Josephson
2009-03-07 14:42                                                   ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07 14:56                                                     ` William Josephson
2009-03-07 15:39                                                     ` Russ Cox
2009-03-07 16:34                                                       ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-07  5:24                                               ` [9fans] threads vs forks lucio
2009-03-04  5:19                   ` David Leimbach
2009-03-04  2:47                 ` John Barham
2009-03-04  5:24                 ` blstuart
2009-03-04  5:37                   ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-04 16:29                   ` Roman V Shaposhnik
2009-03-04 16:56                   ` john
2009-03-06  9:39             ` maht
2009-03-04  5:07     ` David Leimbach
2009-03-04  5:35     ` John Barham
2009-03-03 16:00 ` ron minnich
2009-03-03 16:28   ` hugo rivera
2009-03-03 17:31     ` ron minnich
2009-03-03 16:47 ` John Barham
2009-03-04  9:37   ` Vincent Schut
2009-03-04  9:58     ` hugo rivera
2009-03-04 10:30       ` Vincent Schut
2009-03-04 10:45         ` hugo rivera
2009-03-04 11:15           ` Vincent Schut
2009-03-04 11:33             ` hugo rivera
2009-03-04 13:23               ` Uriel
2009-03-04 14:57         ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=138575260903030733y22df5705qd54d7d117d5628fa@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=uair00@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).