From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d375e920903030732i12f95d0ft8c3ddf579fbeed9f@mail.gmail.com> References: <138575260903030352s623807d7p5a3075b1f7a591f6@mail.gmail.com> <3e1162e60903030719v141b41e9ma5fd98c73d8b0e7c@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920903030732i12f95d0ft8c3ddf579fbeed9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:15:27 +0100 Message-ID: <138575260903030815o4872c725w10744bd4852fbd99@mail.gmail.com> From: hugo rivera To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] threads vs forks Topicbox-Message-UUID: acba5520-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 2009/3/3, Uriel : > Oh, and as I mentioned in another thread, in my experience if you are > going to fork, make sure you compile statically, dynamic linking is > almost as evil as pthreads. But this is lunix, so what do you expect? > not much. Wish I could get it done with plan 9. -- Hugo