From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave Eckhardt <davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] clunk clunk
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0601050139w2336eb70j6739a59bd11c36a3@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <13924.1136583282.1@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2006 16:34:42 -0500
Message-ID: <13925.1136583282@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d36e02ba-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The code looks at c->dev in cclose to see if the
> chan is from devmnt.  If so, cclose places the chan on
> a queue rather than calling devtab[c->dev]->close()
> and chanfree() directly.  A pool of worker processes
> tend the queue, like in exportfs, calling close() and
> chanfree() themselves.

Will that work if there is a cycle with more edges than
the number of worker processes?

Dave Eckhardt