9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] pathetic
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:52:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <139eb44874bee2237034401996735c24@collyer.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <022101c3fd10$4f6eee80$0b00a8c0@SOMA>

Just getting most systems to strongly encourage TLS under SMTP would
impose a CPU tax on bulk mailers, though I don't know if it would be
high enough to really slow them down.

Yeah, caller-id for mail: when we find those weasels, oooh, we're
gonna moidalize 'em!  Not.  The NSA has bin Laden's phone number but
they still haven't caught him.

Our current model of e-mail is a dump truck pulling up to your front
door and pouring unfiltered, unsorted mail through your mail slot, in
a vast heap all over your floor, scaring your cats.  I think it would
be improved by moving to a model more like someone knocking at your
door and trying to persuade your butler to let him (the stranger) talk
to you.  If the butler knows the person at the door, he might let him
in, or might toss him out and bar the door.  If the butler doesn't
know the person, he might take the person's calling card, leaving you
to decide if you want to establish contact.  Over time, the butler
comes to know which people you want let through and which you want him
to call the police to remove / shoot / disappear.  Instead of one
trying to drink from a fire-hose (or cement chute!), each message
would result in a negotiation (perhaps very brief!), which is a more
orderly process, the rate of which can be controlled.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-27 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-25 15:26 ron minnich
2004-02-25 15:41 ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-25 16:02   ` ron minnich
2004-02-26  1:15     ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26  3:45       ` ron minnich
2004-02-26  4:12         ` Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26  6:48         ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26  6:41       ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-25 16:26 ` Aharon Robbins
2004-02-26  6:02 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 10:41 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2004-02-26 11:32   ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 11:33     ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 12:39     ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 12:11       ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 13:42   ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:36   ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 14:41     ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 14:40       ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:47       ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 14:44         ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 15:28           ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 15:38             ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 16:16               ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 17:32                 ` [9fans] SPF+SMTP C H Forsyth
2004-03-01 10:34               ` [9fans] pathetic Vin McLellan
2004-02-26 15:38             ` dbailey27
2004-02-26 14:58               ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-26 15:53                 ` dbailey27
2004-02-27  9:01             ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-27 10:52               ` Geoff Collyer [this message]
2004-02-27 13:07                 ` David Presotto
2004-02-27 20:26                   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2004-02-27 22:22                   ` Tristan Seligmann
2004-02-27 23:36                   ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-27 13:42                 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-27 15:42                   ` a
2004-02-27 17:45                     ` 9nut
2004-02-27 23:10                     ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-29 21:11                     ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 15:16         ` C H Forsyth
2004-02-26 15:37           ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 17:55         ` jmk
2004-02-26 19:23           ` Richard Miller
2004-02-26 19:35             ` jmk
2004-02-26 19:50               ` Richard Miller
2004-02-27 11:04           ` Dan Moniz
2004-02-26 20:46     ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 15:37 ` Derek Fawcus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=139eb44874bee2237034401996735c24@collyer.net \
    --to=geoff@collyer.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).