From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <14096ba5db5eb3013ad32ee1a3efa237@coraid.com> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] acme mail "feature" From: Brantley Coile Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:49:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb700848-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > but the thing that most needs fixing (for my usage pattern anyway) is > the way that upas/fs reads the entire mailbox into RAM. i get around > this by periodically archiving my mailbox, deleting all but the most > recent 6 month's worth of messages, but i'd prefer not to do this. I agree. I have a user who accesses his mail box from pop and keeps all the mail on the server. He has run up pretty large mail boxes in the past. > > all that said, i think the combination of acme mail and upas/fs > is excellent, and i wouldn't use anything else! Here, here!!