From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <140e7ec30709041153i23bca91r2b641b21b0d84ba2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Sep 2007 02:53:35 +0800
From: sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
In-Reply-To: <13426df10709041110x393d4934vf8aa813e99d86f8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070902212734.DF2D31E8C26@holo.morphisms.net>
	<d7c705e9c3355e723c8f69677bf2d851@quanstro.net>
	<140e7ec30709041037wcb4b60bldf20a9d3c52e4e5a@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10709041110x393d4934vf8aa813e99d86f8@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b7bcd134-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/5/07, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/4/07, sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  Well, I guess the next question is: Is malloc's interface sufficient/practical?
>
> sure. I use it all the time, I'm using it now.
>
> I use it several hundred times a second without knowing it, I bet.

 How many times does it return NULL?