From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <140e7ec30802190117x6f74ea23j59cc6170e529353c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:17:02 +0900
From: sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Google search of the day
In-Reply-To: <47B5D5D6.B17D7D10@null.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d1c554290802140951j48c8698au6675ab8870b26b0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<140e7ec30802150131u7961c91at4b9bbe08f04705f0@mail.gmail.com>
	<47B5D5D6.B17D7D10@null.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5a578556-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Feb 18, 2008 6:48 PM, Douglas A. Gwyn <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote:
> sqweek wrote:
> > Is there a fork analog in plan 9?
>
> rfork, which is more general in that the program can specify
> in more detail which resources are to be shared and which are
> to be copied.

 Er, right. I knew that, I meant to ask if there was a SIGSTOP analog.
 I've since glanced at proc(3) which told me "echo stop >/proc/XXXX/ctl".
-sqweek