9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8 cores
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:00:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <140e7ec30807160000p4c678c3bh550d874c0a360788@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <621112A569DAE948AD25CCDCF1C075331AB2EE@dolly.ntdom.cupdx>

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Huntsman
<BHuntsman@mail2.cu-portland.edu> wrote:
> That being said, while huge scalability is certainly research-worthy, does anyone actually run anything on Plan 9 that needs or would otherwise benefit from 8+ CPUs and more than a few GB's of RAM?

 The Blue gene HPC folks come to mind.

> Furthermore, does anyone out there run Plan 9 on non-x86 hardware anymore?

 Some people would like to, but to my knowledge fourth edition hasn't
been ported to any other platforms. I've heard rumors of a near
complete x86_64 port, and there's occasional interest in sparc and ppc
ports.
-sqweek



  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-16  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 22:28 erik quanstrom
2008-07-15 22:27 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2008-07-15 22:35 ` Williams, Mitch
2008-07-16  1:39   ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-16  5:12     ` Benjamin Huntsman
2008-07-16  7:00       ` sqweek [this message]
2008-07-16 12:54         ` Russ Cox
2008-07-16 11:37       ` C H Forsyth
2008-07-16 12:13         ` John Waters
2008-07-16 13:03           ` a
2008-07-16 13:44           ` Uriel
2008-07-16 13:55             ` John Waters
2008-07-16 14:16             ` Robert William Fuller
2008-07-16 13:07       ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-16 13:42         ` Uriel
2008-07-16 15:02         ` Benjamin Huntsman
2008-07-16 18:56           ` Uriel
2008-07-17  7:59             ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-17  9:07               ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-17 10:04                 ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-17 10:14                 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-17 12:55                 ` ron minnich
2008-07-17 12:58                   ` William Josephson
2008-07-17 13:45                   ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-17 14:11                     ` ron minnich
2008-07-17 14:32                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-17 13:32                 ` Paweł Lasek
2008-07-17 14:07                   ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-16 22:44       ` Iruata Souza
2008-07-17  8:38         ` Kernel Panic
2008-07-17 18:14           ` Iruata Souza
2008-07-23 11:42             ` matt
2008-07-23 18:32               ` Iruata Souza
2008-07-16  1:41 ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-07-16 20:38 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-17  2:09   ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-17 10:18     ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-17 12:41 erik quanstrom
2008-07-17 12:56 ` William Josephson
2008-07-17 12:58 ` ron minnich
2008-07-17 13:46   ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-17 14:06     ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=140e7ec30807160000p4c678c3bh550d874c0a360788@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sqweek@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).