From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <140e7ec30810061736h6396e62dw39524e14f43741e4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  7 Oct 2008 08:36:42 +0800
From: sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0810060924p7db19386s8b28dbc1ed2254b2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1223158526.466.10.camel@ginkgo>
	<ee9e417a0810060924p7db19386s8b28dbc1ed2254b2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port lacks exportfs server
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1772a6fc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:
>Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> somehow it dawned on me that plan9port lacks
>> an application to serve a local filesystem
>> over 9P. Is this on purpose?
>
> I pull things in as they are needed.
> I have not needed to serve 9P.

 This reminds me, I recently compiled aux/9pcon against p9p to test
some connections (which was delightfully easy, only some minor rfork
changes required). The result is at
http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/plan9/p9p-9pcon.c should anyone be
interested.
-sqweek