9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sqweek <sqweek@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] devtrace release time
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:50:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <140e7ec30812181450rb47583bw98b6610d148cf11e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2036912d1cfa62a7f51cd04d49faa539@vitanuova.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, C H Forsyth <forsyth@vitanuova.com> wrote:
>> "Alright, my x86-64 board arrived! I wanted to try out some other
>>OSes, what have we here... hmm Plan 9, seems interesting... aw, no
>>native port! Guess I'll try losethos."
>
> the current amd64 port was just to get going, and it also
> checked that the compiler could compile a running kernel.
> it has enough restrictions that you wouldn't use it for
> `production' use (in the Plan 9 sense!), and in the example context you
> gave, it would just lead to mockery.

 Ah. Proof of concept is probably still interesting to someone taking
up the baton, though I guess in this instance they'd be more
interested in what was learned from the prototype in terms of the
changes that need to be made.
 Not that I'm aware of anyone gunning for that job, but I'm still not
seeing the downside of having the code out there. You're not in much
of a position to mock if you download code marked proof of concept
expecting it to be production ready...
-sqweek



  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-18 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-17 19:36 john
2008-12-17 19:50 ` Uriel
2008-12-17 19:55   ` john
2008-12-17 20:08     ` Uriel
2008-12-17 22:07       ` ron minnich
2008-12-17 22:18         ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2008-12-17 23:34         ` Devon H. O'Dell
2008-12-18  3:52         ` lucio
2008-12-18  4:38           ` Uriel
2008-12-18  4:55           ` john
2008-12-18  4:59             ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-12-18  5:04               ` john
2008-12-18  5:08                 ` Uriel
2008-12-18  6:10               ` lucio
2008-12-18  8:08           ` sqweek
2008-12-18  8:47             ` lucio
2008-12-18 11:33               ` sqweek
2008-12-18 11:42                 ` lucio
2008-12-18 13:26                   ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-18 16:30                   ` sqweek
2008-12-18 16:54                     ` Steve Simon
2008-12-18 17:02                       ` lucio
2008-12-18 18:06                       ` sqweek
2008-12-18 18:32                         ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-18 19:06                     ` C H Forsyth
2008-12-18 22:50                       ` sqweek [this message]
2008-12-18 23:59                         ` ron minnich
2008-12-18 16:42               ` ron minnich
2008-12-18 16:59                 ` lucio
2008-12-18 16:25             ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=140e7ec30812181450rb47583bw98b6610d148cf11e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sqweek@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).