From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: YAMANASHI Takeshi <uncover@beat.cc.titech.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] lib9p
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:31:13 EST."
             <20011218163114.C92FC199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <14331.1008737192@beat.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:46:32 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3984473c-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Hi.

> After you
> respond to a flush request you have to make sure that
> r->oldreq will never get responded to.

I agree.  I'm pondering whether to make the parent to
kill the appropriate child in srv->flush(), or to make
the child to check validity of a Req *req before
calling respond(). Hmmm.
--
YAMANASHI Takeshi