From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  7 Feb 2010 15:31:59 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <14367c34fa5acf3071b5cbeacda053e7@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <dd6fe68a1002071201n42094728o7f41d7e23faa24d7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dd6fe68a1002061606r4f58ec17g19d037cc8265303@mail.gmail.com>
	<af298c734424023e1fe904f7bb0708c2@terzarima.net>
	<dd6fe68a1002071201n42094728o7f41d7e23faa24d7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] NaN, +Inf, and -Inf, constants?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d00575e0-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>        [#2] The expression that defines the value of an enumeration
>        constant shall be an integer constant expression that has  a
>        value representable as an int.

the spec also doesn't allow vlong enumerations.
should we remove that ability, too?

- erik