From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:40:46 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <14849bacc444fbfba20568e85ee60fe2@chula.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] replica question Topicbox-Message-UUID: 41473a80-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > However, I don't understand what one should do if this log was removed > or somehow shortened (so that it does not mention the files' addition > anymore). Some such shortening is, I believe, reasonable, since after > say 10 years nobody is probably interested in all the files' changes. > But, if I understand, it is exclusively the log itself (i.e., not the > server database file A.db) that is used for synchronization by > replica... read about compactdb, which is in replica(8). - erik