From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <148b8d69b88efdd9415d414c1d481411@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] re: spam filtering fs
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <20030903095933.E15496@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  3 Sep 2003 10:24:54 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2b01c1a6-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> not frightened off getting a certificate.  And some form of recourse
> in the event of someone stealing the e-mail address, and that's the
> hard part, sadly.

Not just the sad, but also the common part. Most of the spam I get
seems to use addresses from someone else.

I'm afraid that certifying the from address would not work.
I hope bayes is right.