From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <14ec7b180603230936y46e53846u94e225441047dd0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:36:03 -0700 From: "andrey mirtchovski" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti continuous disk activity In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6dcbe5980603230922p5115dc97i55b888505dfbf0a6@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1eb29ccc-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 3/23/06, Charles Forsyth wrote: > it doesn't write to venti except when doing an archive snapshot, > and even during that time fossil itself should respond to requests. > not always. on big dumps (> 3 gigs for my system) fossil will eventually block all requests and the system will become unresponsive. for example, one will be able to open a new rio window on a terminal, but rio will block trying to exec /bin/rc... that was back in 2003, things may have improved significantly since then :)