From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180604100826t234bd9c4jd65293c0397caf62@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:26:56 -0600
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Good enough approximation for ape/pcc
In-Reply-To: <9B80B8DA-2156-4219-8EFF-D3DF15DA7208@telus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b7fc9c10c9cc1ec573f332cec5ed67a9@coraid.com>
	<443A6716.5020801@lanl.gov>
	<9B80B8DA-2156-4219-8EFF-D3DF15DA7208@telus.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 343962ce-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> One processor I'm dealing with has something like a 19 cycle branch
> miss penalty, on a machine where it's memory is only 7 cycles away,
...[snip]...
> Worst quote from Sony: "Think in assembler, but code in C++"


that's an interesting processor you're describing there :)