From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <14ec7b180605081417l39a164ads824254f91e1140b8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:17:10 -0600 From: "andrey mirtchovski" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive In-Reply-To: <6e35c0620605081410j29c99b28n25bdf7843295d8f0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <283f5df10605080804y56b0124ence29c4bd6cfbc3cb@mail.gmail.com> <090054c961a5151cabe817d1a3f724d6@terzarima.net> <283f5df10605081352u1e93ff93rd6d6bed6125ce890@mail.gmail.com> <6e35c0620605081410j29c99b28n25bdf7843295d8f0@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4f6e789a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Given that progress is likely to be evolutionary rather than > revolutionary, what kind of system or environment do you see that has > potential to wean people from autoconf with as minimal hassle as > possible? several times in the past i have been in a situation where i have booted an old plan9 cd with missing incorrect binaries. in those cases i have always resorted to mounting the latest set off sources and either compiling them or (more often) just running the binaries off the Bell-Labs servers. perhaps the future _could_ be just providing an interface to the required build libraries to those who dislike downloading binaries :) perhaps i'm naive, but i've been spoiled with p9 :)