From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180606071615m7791cda6m6374347c3b5f797e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Jun 2006 17:15:32 -0600
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
In-Reply-To: <0687d9b7f3ee8d0f6da02f7c9af09b9f@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200606071450.40128.corey_s@qwest.net>
	<0687d9b7f3ee8d0f6da02f7c9af09b9f@collyer.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e33768c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> it would seem more satisfying to write a gcc-to-c preprocessor.

even that doesn't always help. observe the following result from such
preprocessing (which caused 8c to choke, having set the maximum length
of a line of C code to be no greater than 32K characters):

http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/screenshots/ffmpeg.gif