From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180607271611h4ec23d9co52b8fa77c234118e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:11:33 -0600
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: RE : RE : [9fans] Plan 9 demos for 4+ CPUs?
In-Reply-To: <00a001c6b1d1$1d29fcd0$ed33a8c0@17xl262>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <14ec7b180607271552t2619643cg5726ed23f7ca144d@mail.gmail.com>
	<00a001c6b1d1$1d29fcd0$ed33a8c0@17xl262>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9129d824-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 7/27/06, Frederic Bonfanti <f.bonfanti@freesurf.fr> wrote:
> Andrey, your file server was the 1st machine (Plan9) right? I'm asking this because your load remains very low while your interrupt level is likely to be what occurs when storage consumes most of them.

you are correct, though in this case i believe the load was caused by
a lot of ethernet traffic, not the file server itself.