From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180608072315k7a1d2aa6v951709751f19082e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Aug 2006 00:15:55 -0600
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] timesync doubletime
In-Reply-To: <f79e679c43fb2d6d7f9205ad79c15f87@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a1ff96668f3d5917ae8718a8bcd37271@quanstro.net>
	<f79e679c43fb2d6d7f9205ad79c15f87@quintile.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 99a3076e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> There was some weirdness a few years ago with laptops whos clock would run very fast if the machine was spended and then resumed, maybe that is what you mean?

definitely not a laptop. it was one of the desktops at the University
of Calgary i used as a cpu server...