From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180611071549s5dedf983ia5870a7ebcef5323@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  7 Nov 2006 16:49:03 -0700
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] mimicking Plan 9 paper style with LaTeX?
In-Reply-To: <5b76d2bd93d4e6678c5eb05288d82f61@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <0d1ac62f33d21affe44a2bc725fab027@9netics.com>
	<5b76d2bd93d4e6678c5eb05288d82f61@9netics.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dc896398-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i tried with -15 and the text is higher (on both plan9 and osx'
preview). please note that acme.ps is formatted differently than
auth.ps (auth.ps being the paper we were supposed to match): for
example there is paragraph indentation and the top and bottom margins
are larger than auth.ps.

to add further to the confusion, /sys/doc/auth.ps differs visually
from the one that was given as a benchmark (no numbering in the second
one, for example)

anrey

On 11/7/06, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> what i wanted to post in my last message was:
>
> > i think i finally dialled it. see the attach comparison.
>
> margins don't seem to match up (i used acme.ps). e.g. this matches
> the the paper better.
>
> \topmargin -15mm
>
> will there be printed material? a4 or letter size?
>
>