Re: [9fans] FTQ benchmark available

["andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>]

the only major difference would be between the respective
"getticks()" and "cycles()" implementations, i think.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:28 PM,  <john@csplan9.rit.edu> wrote:
>
> >>  i wonder if they'll give the same results!
>  >
>  > yes, the results are very similar (it's not an exact number). top here
>  > is the original ftq, bottom is John's port:
>  >
>  > http://mirtchovski.com/screenshots/ftq.jpg
>  >
>  > btw, John, please add a "clean" option to the mkfile; also,
>  > exits("success") is wrong.
>
>  Ok, fixed that stuff and ran some tests of my own.
>  My ftq: http://csplan9.rit.edu/users/john/my-ftq.png
>  Original ftq: http://csplan9.rit.edu/users/john/other-ftq.png
>
>  The FFTs look very different; I wonder which one is more correct?
>  I ran these tests one after the other on our CPU/auth/file server,
>  which had only one user (me) logged in over drawterm.
>
>  John
>
>
>