From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180810100845v49153e62nc337f46dd8d62c3b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:45:07 -0600
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10810100833l7e996108k85602f4872436e3a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a560a5d00810100702p58740bafj9efa743d39fd5016@mail.gmail.com>
	<da002191c1b35f233999efe420157352@quanstro.net>
	<a560a5d00810100825m491d0b3akf702f29175701c0@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10810100833l7e996108k85602f4872436e3a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in rio: unhiding deleted windows
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1b75fdbc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ruda, go ahead and have a go at putting your key sequence into rio.
> You may find it pretty easy to do ...

if rio is broken it may not be able to figure out the key sequence. it
should go in devcons, where the rest of the ^T^T stuff is. i still
think that a hard look at ^T^TD with a lot of poking around
(preferably with a large hammer) may provide a method for killing a
particular process but i don't have a terminal handy to verify.