From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <14ec7b180811152257y7f5aa146t90e89c962b210990@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:57:17 -0700
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <mirtchovski@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <1282469A8843837F996E64E1@192.168.1.2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <DBCC6BB0C82C348357A14A53@192.168.1.2>
	<98CCE297-BE54-4ADA-B57D-DB8FE71060BA@sun.com>
	<b3b4f6f30811151413y17734ca3tc699fbf8bd497f0f@mail.gmail.com>
	<1282469A8843837F996E64E1@192.168.1.2>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45c9c0d0-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> 5. If you need NAT weigh the options of doing it. It may turn out that
> importing /net is the best choice for your application. Or it may turn out
> otherwise. /net has a raison d'etre--regular NAT, too.

If regular NAT hadn't been invented you wouldn't be thinking in terms
of regular NAT, therefore you wouldn't be "needing NAT".

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. (you'll find it under "logical fallacy" on wikipedia)