From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090409230615.9F7785B12@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <14ec7b180904091059i6396102fn483cd7ec59dd65de@mail.gmail.com> <179a609122ce2818022296098855f41c@quintile.net> <14ec7b180904091430r34d17a0bxc8072f4f2ede1443@mail.gmail.com> <14ec7b180904091431x1c775dfbke9d7fea4c361718d@mail.gmail.com> <20090409230615.9F7785B12@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:10:47 -0600 Message-ID: <14ec7b180904091610y3fd8abdao1ebca4d19d77246a@mail.gmail.com> From: andrey mirtchovski To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] extensions of "interest" Topicbox-Message-UUID: d8f40ef6-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Unfortunately we don't have exact analogs in s/w. We can > only simplicate; we can't add lightness! but somehow we can add "weight". can't we? bash is perceivably "heavier" than rc, xml perceivably "heavier" than 9p... statlite() perceivably "heavier" than stat() :) we just don't quantify "weight" in terms of kilos, but we know it's there...