From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <49E78FA9.7080206@home.se> <14ec7b180904161604s1588b5b8k91c5740aefd18f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:49:26 -0600 Message-ID: <14ec7b180904161949q77997669m54b3d7beae65ea20@mail.gmail.com> From: andrey mirtchovski To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] To virtualise cpu/fs/auth-servers, or not? Topicbox-Message-UUID: df9d1b94-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > it breaks down when you realize that some resources (processes, memory) > are not part of a namespace. neither are the VMs running on a single node (looked at from dom0, to give the conventional Xen example). the effects of a process running in one VM could still be felt in another, even if that process can't be seen in a /proc on it. that 'ps' in plan9 can view every process on a plan9 machine is simply a convenience bestowed upon us by its creators.