From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15085.44390.378910.364737@nido.hilbert.space>
From: paurea@dei.inf.uc3m.es
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9 on VMware
In-Reply-To: <200104301335.f3UDZ9b01745@egon>:chad's message of 09:34:09 Monday,30 April 2001
References: <20010430121049.55CD919A28@mail.cse.psu.edu>
	<2283649171.20010430142045@proweb.co.uk>
	<200104301335.f3UDZ9b01745@egon>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 20:22:30 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9780b18c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

chad writes:
 > From: chad <yandros@mit.edu>
 > Subject: Re: [9fans] 9 on VMware
 > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:34:09 -0400
 >
 >
 > There's no doubt by anyone that there is potential value in being able
 > to run Plan 9 inside of VMware.  The problem is that VMWare considers
 > the software video system to be proprietary information that they're
 > not currently interested in sharing with outside parties.

There is an open source project very similar to VMware,
http://www.plex86.org/ I don't know its actual state of development,
but maybe it is a good substitute...
--
                 Saludos,
                         Gorka

"Curiosity sKilled the cat"
--
    /"\
    \ /    ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
     X                           - against ms attachments
    / \