9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : freebsd || linux ?
Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2018 09:39:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538642351.2461724.1530360128.301FCC7C@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884BE8B1-6929-4EC3-8B4D-CA9D3A24C266@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Rui Carmo wrote:
> I wouldn’t allow the passive-aggressive mood that surfaces here from 
> time to time to turn me off the project. 
> 
> That said, I’m fascinated by how often (and how quickly) some threads 
> devolve into “there is no point in doing that” or “we don’t need those 
> modern contraptions” arguments - reminds me a lot of some of the hard 
> boiled academia types I used to work with back when VMS started losing 
> ground. 

I think a lot of us are hard boiled academic types, whether we've been through academia or not. :)

> As much as some folk here are not exactly fond of various nuances of 
> modern tech (from Linux to X to git, etc.),  I don’t think there’s any 
> need for dissing personal efforts to use or improve various aspects of 
> Plan9 (including, horror of horrors, making the user land a bit more 
> modern and usable, or at least more accessible to mainstream users).

My perspective is, "More modern or more usable, which do you mean?" :)  Many years ago, when I was under constant stress and had healed far less than I have now, modern GUIs were, in practice, the uttermost extreme of unusability!  The situation improved as I healed, as mouse technology improved, and as the worst excesses of 80s/90s GUI practice diminished somewhat, but I still find them insanely restrictive and awkward for the most part.  Even the parts which I find helpful are delivered in an awkward way, such as menus.

Then there's the question of what Mayuresh is trying to do.  His goal necessarily necessarily includes retaining parts of Linux which I've found through experience to be horrible!  Some of these parts would be the same in various BSDs; the userland for them is the same.  In some of these cases GUIs actually improve the situation, but Mayuresh's plan is to exclude those GUIs; you cannot have them with "minimal xorg".  As far as I'm concerned, the way of minimal POSIX is the way of pain.  Other people with different aptitudes may find it easier, I suppose.

-- 
Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long -- Ogden Nash



  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-04  3:49 sl
2018-10-04  5:13 ` Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-04  5:32   ` Iruatã Souza
2018-10-04  7:38 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2018-10-04  7:50   ` Rui Carmo
2018-10-04  8:39     ` Ethan Gardener [this message]
2018-10-04  8:50     ` Kurt H Maier
2018-10-04 10:33       ` Rui Carmo
2018-10-04 16:31         ` Iruatã Souza
2018-10-04 17:00           ` hiro
2018-10-04 18:02             ` Steve Simon
2018-10-04 18:34               ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2018-10-04 19:21               ` Steven Stallion
2018-10-04 19:41                 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2018-10-04 20:20                   ` hiro
2018-10-04 20:57                     ` Steven Stallion
2018-10-04 20:36                   ` Alexander Keller
2018-10-04 21:00                     ` hiro
2018-10-04 20:55                 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2018-10-04 17:42         ` Kurt H Maier
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-04 21:56 sl
2018-10-02 11:30 Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-02 12:01 ` Lucio De Re
2018-10-02 12:11   ` Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-02 12:43     ` Lucio De Re
2018-10-02 14:26       ` Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-02 14:32 ` Roderick
2018-10-02 14:43   ` hiro
2018-10-02 14:40     ` Roderick
2018-10-02 16:35   ` Iruatã Souza
2018-10-02 14:41 ` Dave MacFarlane
2018-10-02 17:14   ` Ethan Gardener
2018-10-02 17:22   ` Bakul Shah
2018-10-02 17:26     ` Steve Simon
2018-10-02 18:10       ` hiro
2018-10-02 19:18         ` Kurt H Maier
2018-10-03 21:23 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2018-10-04  3:44   ` Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-04  8:01     ` Ethan Gardener
2018-10-05  1:44     ` Bakul Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1538642351.2461724.1530360128.301FCC7C@webmail.messagingengine.com \
    --to=eekee57@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).