From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15800.42677.316274.249416@nanonic.hilbert.space>
From: paurea@gsyc.escet.urjc.es
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Essay: Is network transparency something bad?
In-Reply-To: <23e4a29fd1979cad8dacf523fed91fbd@centurytel.net>:Skip Tavakkolian's message of 17:49:09 Thursday,24 October 2002
References: <23e4a29fd1979cad8dacf523fed91fbd@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 04:04:37 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0cacad7a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Skip Tavakkolian writes:
 > This is not an excuse, but if you are having connectivity problems
 > what difference would it make if /net is mounted locally or imported?

If /net is local you don't obtain hangups everywhere they are localized
(at least this is what I experimented this morning, things hanged all at once
and when I had  /net local they did so much more gradually. If the net channel
goes down all the net connectons hang.)

 > of a cpu server under the control of a professional getting paid to
 > maintain it -- as in an ISP or an enterprise setup -- would be much
 > higher than your average (desk|lap|palm)top.
 >

I am not discussing that.
--
                 Saludos,
                         Gorka

"Curiosity sKilled the cat"