9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Eckhardt <davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:43:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15937.1632116621@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd0wvDa-ArTWysvOWsN+k1AV5yqbbpvMVJuAa3n-QK4jmj+rg@mail.gmail.com>

> Anyone know if this project went anywhere?
>
> https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf

Sadly, not.  One issue is that modern Android releases don't
support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was
attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since).

But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here:

  https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv

If wide availability, meaning being able to have a phone UI running
on random cheap Android phones, is a goal, you'd presumably want
to target one or more vendor releases of Android.

But if a low-cruft solution were desired, it might be desirable to
target AOSP or GrapheneOS.  Both of those boot *dramatically* faster
than vendor ROMs, and it's because there is just less code.

Between the two of them, GrapheneOS might be better: it doesn't run
on a lot of phones, but some of them are cheap enough, and switching
from the vendor ROM to GrapheneOS is easy enough.  Compared to AOSP,
GrapheneOS has some genuine usability features, e.g., a usable
backup/restore solution.

Hopefully some of this is useful.  Sorry I can't provide more!

Dave Eckhardt

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-Mb39cc944a90b85f939dd26dc
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29 19:23 [9fans] Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021 Anthony Sorace
2021-02-01  0:31 ` ~vidak
2021-02-01  9:35   ` sirjofri
2021-02-01 11:07     ` svaderaa
2021-02-01 11:26   ` Bakul Shah
2021-02-02  1:15     ` raingloom
2021-02-01  7:16 ` [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas (WAS: Re: Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021) cigar562hfsp952fans
2021-02-01 20:46   ` Steve Simon
2021-02-03 14:14     ` Ethan Gardener
2021-02-01 21:47   ` [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas sirjofri
2021-02-03 14:07     ` Ethan Gardener
2021-08-06 16:25     ` Jack Johnson
2021-08-19 21:06       ` unobe
2021-09-20  4:52       ` [9fans] " cigar562hfsp952fans
2021-09-20  5:08         ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20  5:11         ` vidak
2021-09-20 15:02           ` ori
2021-09-20  5:43       ` Dave Eckhardt [this message]
2021-09-20  7:51         ` [9fans] " Ethan Gardener
2021-09-20  8:23           ` hiro
2021-09-20  8:37             ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20  8:39               ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20  8:45                 ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20  8:52                   ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20  8:58                     ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20 11:06                       ` Conor Williams
2021-09-21  9:01             ` Ethan Gardener
2021-09-20 11:05           ` sirjofri
2021-09-20 11:08             ` Conor Williams
2021-09-20 14:01               ` sirjofri
2021-09-21  9:25             ` Ethan Gardener
2021-02-02  8:29   ` [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas (WAS: Re: Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021) tlaronde
2021-02-03 15:07     ` Ethan Gardener
2021-01-19 11:08       ` pouya+lists.9fans
2021-02-03 18:58         ` Ethan Gardener
2021-02-06  2:17     ` David Arroyo
2021-02-03 18:26   ` ori
2021-02-03 23:31   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2021-02-05 16:42   ` Ethan Gardener
2021-02-07 22:59     ` [9fans] Re: GSoC 2021 project ideas cigar562hfsp952fans
2021-02-09  0:26       ` Steve Simon
2021-02-09  1:59         ` [9fans] " Jeff Sickel
2021-02-09  0:34       ` [9fans] " Ethan Gardener
2021-02-02  5:30 ` [9fans] Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021 ori
2021-02-02 10:40 ` [9fans] Project idea (was: Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021) sirjofri
2021-02-02 16:07 ` [9fans] Re: Plan 9 Applying to GSoC 2021 Jeff Sickel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15937.1632116621@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu \
    --to=davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).