From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:55:35 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <15adcddaacabd54f772b69a24f72945e@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <20130724223831.f/7DZAZ/zn9IdHZP3sfBHBfb@dietcurd.local> References: <201307240259.r6O2xWGj003062@skeeve.com> <20130724223831.f/7DZAZ/zn9IdHZP3sfBHBfb@dietcurd.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] off topic: full unicode support isn't easy Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6d17784a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Jul 24 17:39:45 EDT 2013, sdaoden@gmail.com wrote: > erik quanstrom wrote: > |0. uncode support isn't binary. one might reasonably support a subs= et. >=20 > But it is not that you are totally against supporting > decomposition that includes Korean ("Hangul Syllable > Decomposition", must be performed algorithmically)? > It's only missing yet. i wasn't making any statements about particular languages, or even endorsing supporting a subset. but consider, file names in plan 9 support a subset of unicode. they may not contain the codepoints u+00002f (/) or u+000000. otherwise, a directory could contain the file entry "a/b" or "a/b\0c" which could lead to confusion. many file servers expand the frogs list to include codepoints < or =E2=89=A4 u+00020 (space) to prevent accidents. http://xkcd.com/327/ - erik