hiro:
    The purpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the file. I was working off the quote below.  Maybe a file server thats purpose is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you could then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate connections.

eg.
    % mux -C 3 -F large.file
    % tree.
          ├── large.file
          └── large.file.mux
              ├── 1
              ├── 2
              └── 3

1 directory, 4 files

Like I said though still learning though.

On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote:
> There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really
work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized
by the server on the other connection.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te69bb0fce0f0ffaf-Mb319f4f5aae92c0b9de48f76
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription