hiro:
The purpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the file. I was working off the quote below. Maybe a file server thats purpose is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you could then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate connections.
eg.
% mux -C 3 -F large.file
% tree.
├── large.file
└── large.file.mux
├── 1
├── 2
└── 3
1 directory, 4 files
Like I said though still learning though.
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote:
There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really
work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized
by the server on the other connection.